Reading this month's (April 2012) Redeemer Newsletter, I was disturbed by the article \"Introducing Community Groups: Fellowship Groups Get a New Name!\".<\/p>\n
It is more like \"fellowship groups get name downgrade\".<\/p>\n
My E-mail to the community leaders explains it all:<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Well, Community groups sound very \u201cuniversal\u201d and welcoming.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n But I still do not feel the need of replacing the name It is better to teach what the biblical \u201ckoinonia\u201d truly I\u2019d rather say I belong to a fellowship group or Christian But I guess, I am just too late nor have the authority to However, I feel it is important for the \u201ccommunity\u201d to know Sincerely in my prayer always with love, <\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Reading this month's (April 2012) Redeemer Newsletter, I was disturbed by the article \"Introducing Community Groups: Fellowship Groups Get a New Name!\". It is more like \"fellowship groups get name downgrade\". My E-mail to the community leaders explains it all: … Continue reading
\n\u201cfellowship\u201d. Because I do not think it is an old term, nor necessary to be
\ncompromised to be more \u201cseeker\u201d friendly.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n
\nmeans, than to do away\/water down the terms from the Book.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n
\ncommunity group, and add \u201cit is a community group welcoming everyone\u201d to
\nstrangers, than \u201cjust to say\u201d I belong to a \u201ccommunity group\u201d.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n
\ndeal with this.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n
\nwhat some few (if not only I) are thinking about this.
\n<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n
\nTimothy Law<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n