Following Arianism, Newton believed not the trinity doctrine. Could this have caused his narrow view of the classical mechanics? A genius of his time, Newton has many defenders of the latest generations to his humility in his physics principles.<\/p>\n
To the least, could there be any relationship at all causing a narrow view between theology and his understanding of space and time.<\/p>\n
[@more@]<\/p>\n
I believe like many, Newton's scientific approach was based on hunches, clues and bread crumbs. The doctrine of trinity begins with the realm of revelation, a progressive one.<\/p>\n
On the other hand, Newton wasn't too stubborn. For he pursued the unexplained in alchemy, forerunner of chemistry. Nonetheless, he was persistent enough to tackle the unexplained over all things until a resolution was found. Solutions must be found regardless. Such is the birth of narrow viewpoints. A scientific contradiction to that of Gauss, who would rest at Fermat's last enigma.<\/p>\n
Such scientific approach, though incredibly remarkable, is shamed by that of the latest generations. It was unfortunate, that Newton, genuine enough to glorify God, had to bring his limited view on the universe to his grave. It was his limitation irrespectively. Together with the world of his era.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Following Arianism, Newton believed not the trinity doctrine. Could this have caused his narrow view of the classical mechanics? A genius of his time, Newton has many defenders of the latest generations to his humility in his physics principles. To … Continue reading