{"id":619,"date":"2007-08-24T16:50:19","date_gmt":"2007-08-24T16:50:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/nycphantom.com\/journal\/?p=619"},"modified":"2007-08-24T16:50:19","modified_gmt":"2007-08-24T16:50:19","slug":"line-of-seth,-nephilim","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/nycphantom.com\/journal\/?p=619","title":{"rendered":"Line of Seth, Nephilim"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In Genesis 4:26, many Jewish doctors were of the opinion that the word &quot; &#1492;&#1493;&#1495;&#1500;&quot; (<em>huchal<\/em>) is translated &quot;began profanely&quot;. This of course, would have significant impact in interpreting the line of Seth to be a line called to be Holy, sons of God.<\/p>\n<p>Maimonides has elaborated this issue in his &quot;Treatise on Idolatry&quot;.<\/p>\n<p>Although &quot;&#1492;&#1493;&#1495;&#1500;&quot; huchal is rooted to &quot;&#1495;&#1500;&#1500;&quot; (<em>chalal<\/em>) which can mean &quot;profane&quot; as well as begin-as if by an opening-wedge. There are other instances in the Bible where &#1492;&#1493;&#1495;&#1500; is used solely for &quot;began&quot; without any negative indication.<\/p>\n<p>However, by means of motive, I would rather assume that it is not improbable that the Jews are of the intention:<\/p>\n<p>1. Sons of God, always to be understood as angels\/supernatural beings.<\/p>\n<p>2. Maintaining that should there be any people of God, the Jews(Of Abraham) are the first and only: Enoch and Noah are individuals, not a full race. Thus interpreting Seth&#39;s line to be a Godly one would contradict the primal favor of the Jewish line.<\/p>\n<p>Hence I am in disagreement with Rev. David Chen in this argument. Although I can appreciate Rev. Chen&#39;s enthusiasm in the Jewish culture, I wouldn&#39;t consider the modern Jews having much to say about Biblical edification since many of its tradition and foundational beliefs have been altered significantly after time.<\/p>\n<p>Naturally, when it comes to interpreting &quot;sons of God&quot; in Genesis 6, it would be easier to assign it as &quot;fallen angels&quot; rather than Seth&#39;s descendants, had we understood Genesis 4:26 to be corruption of the line of Enos.  <\/p>\n<p>It was until Julius Africanus, a Christian writer, during the 3rd century, disagreed on the interpretation of &quot;Nephilim&quot; which also means &quot;fallen one\/men&quot; with what earlier church fathers believed to be &quot;fallen angels&quot;. Augustine then made it popular in his &quot;City of God&quot; in the idea of &quot;line of Seth&quot;.<\/p>\n<p>Even today, this is still widely debated. I personally, do not feel the necessity to denounce one after another. However, for simplicity, I would lean towards the &quot;line of Seth&quot; interpretation. It is also more edifying and keep me Biblically centered. While the other interpretation would bring in a more complex understanding of the whole universe, one that can easily perverse oneself. Not that I would reject this one, but I would hold on to one simpler interpretation while carefully examine the other one.  <\/p>\n<p>[@more@]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In Genesis 4:26, many Jewish doctors were of the opinion that the word &quot; &#1492;&#1493;&#1495;&#1500;&quot; (huchal) is translated &quot;began profanely&quot;. This of course, would have significant impact in interpreting the line of Seth to be a line called to be &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/nycphantom.com\/journal\/?p=619\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-619","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-theologization"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/nycphantom.com\/journal\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/619","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/nycphantom.com\/journal\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/nycphantom.com\/journal\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nycphantom.com\/journal\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nycphantom.com\/journal\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=619"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/nycphantom.com\/journal\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/619\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/nycphantom.com\/journal\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=619"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nycphantom.com\/journal\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=619"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nycphantom.com\/journal\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=619"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}