认罪的不骄傲

基督徒A,B,C 在“作见证”:

A: 我以前是个阿飞!

B: 那算什么。我以前是个连环杀手!

C: 哎呀,你们的都是小儿科。我以前是培养希特勒,奥萨马的大法师!

D: 你们到底是在认罪,还是赏罪?

Posted in Dialogues, Theologization | Leave a comment

Redeemer's new Branch: Lincoln Square

With Michael Keller (Tim Keller's son) as senior pastor there, I suspect the number will be impartially large there comparing to 3 other sites. I've seen people requesting CD recordings from either Kellers, but never any other pastor.

Posted in News | Leave a comment

Disabling MS ACCESS Navigation Pane

It's been a while since I noted the security problem with displaying the Navigation Pane for all users. I looked for solution but it was hard to find, mostly complex codes were suggested.

But since there is kind of a need for it at work, I looked it up again and found that it's not that hard to disable/hide the navigation pane. Including disabling the shortcut key to open the navigation pane - F11.

Hiding the Navigation Pane - two ways.

  1. By code:
    DoCmd.NavigateTo "acNavigationCategoryObjectType"
    DoCmd.RunCommand acCmdWindowHide
  2. From option menu:
    Access Options -> Current Database -> Navigation -> Display Navigation Pane -> (Uncheck it)

The users have an alternative to open Navigation Pane with F11. So, the trick to disable it is assigning F11 to something else, such as Beep action. To make it a global (otherwise the solution must be implemented in every forms, etc.) effect, it has to be done in macro, not VBA scripting. To create such macro, under Create Tab -> Macro -> macro name = {F11} -> Action = beep. Save it as something like AutoKeys.

Note: {} means function key. +{F11} means shift-F11, ^{F11} means cntrl-F11.

This saved macro appears to only be accessible in the Navigation Pane.

Posted in Technical | Leave a comment

A Duty in a Church vs. Other All Jobs

I am making this under question category because I cannot think right now due to finals. It is also under "reflection" category as it may pertain to the kind of attitude a Christian should have in any work place.

I use "duty" instead of "job" because there is a distinction. Church can hire non-christians to do certain job: cleaning, staffing, etc. However, the term duty I refer to the kind of job one does to serve God intentionally. Thus, a duty is a job performed by only Christians: pastor, church leaders, Bible study teacher, preacher, etc.

There may be further distinction between a "duty" and a "job", or between a pastor and an employee in company XYZ:

That is, a pastor can never say (in any condition), I'm here because I was asked/hired/invited, with the implication that he wouldn't be here otherwise. As if he's saying, I am not really serving God, I only answer to those committee members who hire me, if they are not serious about it, I shouldn't take it seriously either, God is not in the picture. This is basically blasphemy.

However, a regular employee from company XYZ could use this line of reasoning. He breaks no human law. Even if he's a Christian.

This is because the former deals with only the law of God; while the latter does not necessarily do so directly. Therefore, that line of reasoning is applicable only under human law.

So the question would be, would a job of any kind, still be under God's law of servitude to God, such that such line of reasoning (in bold text above), would never never be applicable anywhere.

My inclination is that such reasoning is never applicable anywhere in any situation. However, there may be degrees of applicability of such reasoning in secular/pagan work place.

God does not beg us to do a job. However, a person can do so. If that is so, is it still a job? Who's the boss and who submit to whom? Is it misleading to have invitation/plea disguised as a job? Nevertheless, A Christian employee does not see things the same as a non-Christian one.

Posted in Questions, Reflection, Theologization | Leave a comment

C.S. Lewis and Inclusivism

There was this article about 6 Heretics (Lewis, Martin Luther, Augustine, William Barclay, John Stott & Billy Graham) Who should be banned from Evangelicalism.

That article has lots of errors, which has been rectified by someone else.

However, Lewis' view on inclusivism is quite clear, in his book Mere Christianity:

There are people who do not accept the full Christian doctrine about Christ but who are so strongly attracted by Him that they are His in a much deeper sense than they themselves understand. There are people in other religions who are being led by God’s secret influence to concentrate on those parts of their religion which are in agreement with Christianity, and who thus belong to Christ without knowing it. For example, a Buddhist of good will may be led to concentrate more and more on the Buddhist teaching about mercy and to leave in the background (though he might still say he believed) the Buddhist teaching on certain other points. (178)

 

Posted in Theologization | Leave a comment

Self Examining + Perceiving Other Critics

If one is adamant of the theological issues with others; then what does it say about how one deals with the theology of those closer to one, especially when there are sharp distinctions. Can one simply just say "Oh I wasn't aware of the problem in him/her" or any other excuses?

Posted in Reflection, Theologization | Leave a comment

Why American Evangelism Fail

Preaching on the streets is good. However, today, American evangelical preachers do not deal with the objections from the secular, from secular scientists, etc. The way they deal with them is sheer ignorance. They apply the notion: As long as I preached it from my mouth, I'm done. I did my duty.

Ultimately they gather themselves together, as a mean of maintaining their ego. Now their counterpart which sprung from the same evangelical background, also band up together with their own kind for the same reason.

The only way for evangelism to work under God, is via sacrifice. Sacrifice of ego. Not counting the opposing party complete folly.

Posted in Theologization | Leave a comment

吃过苦与没吃过苦的受苦观

双方都认为受苦代价不宜。

但吃过苦的能更分辨得出重要的何不重要的,有效或无效的,证明了自己在受苦中炼成金;

没吃过苦的,只能认出受过苦的结果,然后以其认识来证明自己对受苦的价值观的看重,可惜自己却无法再行事上有任何长进的效率。结果,在只有两条出路中,通常不选自己努力自我改进的路,只选不准被别人批评的路。。。可怜哪!

Posted in Reflection | Leave a comment

Struggle of the Day

Trying to write a Gospel-centric paper for a secular Bible (Tanach) class under the Jewish Department as a requirement to my graduation.

The Title of my paper: The Idea of Mashiach in the Bible

Gospel-centric because of my duty to God. Secular because I want to graduate and get an A.

Posted in Reflection | Leave a comment

Teaching Resume

If I were to find a teaching job, my cover letter will read something as short as this:

Today in colleges, many professors teach students in class how to do 1+1, and make congruence modulo, Jacobian Matrix, etc. as reading/homework assignments.

I'm going to change that.

Posted in Reflection | Leave a comment