Librarian Qualification

If one's qualification is merely that of a librarian, one should not be a pastor nor a preacher (maybe not even a Christian).

A preacher's duty involves having read a great deal of books, but absolutely not limited to the ability to recommend books to others. In fact, it is rarely a good idea to recommend books to those who never ask for them in the first place.

Therefore, one must be articulate enough to communicate an idea, not merely giving citations.

What principle of the Bible am I applying here? Perhaps Matthew 25:14-30, the Parable of 10 talents.

Posted in Theologization | Leave a comment

Views of the Eucharist

On views of the sacramental elements of the Eucharist:

Roman Catholics (transubstantiation): the transformation of the elements into the miraculous presence of the body of Christ and also creating the presence of Christ's sacrifice making forgiveness possible.

Greek Orthodox (divine Liturgy): the mysterious presence of the body of Christ.

Lutherans (sacramental union): the union of the elements with real already existing body of Christ. It is not consubstantiation which presents the body in a physical space.

Calvin (my position): the spiritual effect of the believe in the presence of the truth of the things signified. It is not Bullinger's receptionism which makes the miracle only true for the faithful.

Zwingli (memorialism - popular position): A reminder and remembrance in a symbolic sense.

Posted in Theologization | Leave a comment

The OT Bible (Tanakh) in Modern Scholarship

This corresponds to a course I am taking in college.

Though the class is named "The Bible as Literature", this is actually a course about modern scholarship in the Tanakh.

The idea of modern scholarship is this: The religious, the God-fearing ones are not as scientifically informed or as academically educated to KNOW that what they believe in the Bible is false.

A "good" way to end a debate: Claim the others are not academically qualified to make a case.

An easy response/defense is this: The academics are trapped in their own conviction so much that they believe their belief is anything infallible but a mere belief. Not to mention that this academic conviction is rather un-academic nor is it honest science.

The professor explained to me that she's considered an Epikoros in the synagogue, similar to heretic/apostate in Christianity but not as discriminated in the synagogues as those in churches.

A good description of this topic can be found here. The article is so well written that I am going to paste it in the comment in case of broken link.

Posted in Projects, Theologization | 1 Comment

On Argument

An argument is going nowhere when the other side is ignoring and talking about what you already know or would agree.

Posted in Reflection | Leave a comment

VLC Media Player VLSUB problem

Freezing...possibly due to wrong url/ip

Solution: open the Windows\System 32\Drivers\Etc\Host file with Notepad and add this at the bottom (on a new line) 92.240.234.122 api.opensubtitles.org

Posted in Technical | Leave a comment

Canons of Dort

From the famous Synod of Dort (1618-1619):

I once heard Dr. Tong mentioned of its refusal to excommunicate the Arminians as heretics.

I believe the First Head Article 16 of the canons is relevant to it. That we ought to be gracious towards these earnest brethren who are lack of faith (Tong: lower IQ).

Posted in Theologization | Leave a comment

Free Will Definition

This is from the Ligonier lesson on Understanding Free Will by R.C. Sproul (Lesson 5: Sovereign Grace).

From Augustinians: The ability to do what we want.

Jonathan Edwards on free will definition: Free will is that which our minds choose according to our strongest inclination/desire at the moment.

Edwards argued against pagan philosophers that stated that true free will must be indifference. Such as the Alice (in Wonderland) asking Cheshire cat on which path to take, but when she couldn't tell the cat where she wants to go, the cat replied that it really doesn't matter which path to take in that case. Edwards said that this is illogical because: 1. it would not have been a moral choice (which requires reason to choose), 2. it would be impossible to choose at all! - since it has no cause - undermines the law of causality. Thus, the idea of indifference choice => nonsensical concept.

Edwards further made the distinction between: natural & moral ability (similar to Augustine's freewill & liberty). We have natural ability, but lack the moral ability to choose the things of God.

The problem is we always do what we want, and what we want, without grace, is always evil. This is the free will of our fallen state. We ALWAYS (MUST) choose and do according to our strongest desire. We not only can choose, but we MUST choose what we want. This is the definition of free will, not the opposite of it.

Though we still have free will, we have lost, according to Augustine, the Liberty (choosing God, do what God wants, moral ability), since the Fall. Hence our will is corrupted.

Posted in Theologization, Vocabularies | 1 Comment

Indifference & Stupidity

Redeemer's famous quote: "The opposite of love is indifference."

The generation of indifference comes from the generation of niceness (as in foolishness).

I look at the academic pridefuls, when I see indifference in their characters, I search and find the foolish zeal of those who brought them up.

Posted in Theologization | Leave a comment

Pelagianism

Pelagius, pious Irish who had problem with Augustine's prayer: "Oh God, grant what Thou Commandest; and Command what Thou dost desire". The first part of the prayer means "grant me the grace to do your will."

Pelagius: "If God commands those to do what they are unable to do, God is not just."

This touches on issues of moral responsibility.

So, are we inherently good? Pelagians: "Yes, the original sin has not tainted us. Grace facilitates and helps us to do good, it is not a necessity. Jesus is a good moral example for us in our redemption."

Sproul on Pelagianism vs. orthodox doctrine (We are debtors we can't pay our debts ourselves):
Pelagian: We are either no debtors or we can pay our debts ourselves.

Posted in Theologization | Leave a comment

The Law of Supercomplexity

Like Steno's Law of Superposition, I propose "The Law of Supercomplexity":

All diversities come from more complexity. The less complex something is, the younger it is.

Entropy principle may apply.

This could debunk the theory of macro-evolution, which starts everything with the simplest forms.

Posted in Biology | Leave a comment