Thoughts

Last Sunday's sermon, Pastor Chris had a catchy phrase: Don't ask what would Jesus do, ask what did Jesus say. It's great phrase when in context - those who ask what would Jesus do, normally do not know who Jesus truly is, they based Him off of their own version of Jesus, their own basis for what a nice guy would be. In that case, this phrase works. On the other hand, which I won't bicker about too much, is that if you truly know Jesus and wish to imitate Jesus, of course that's begging the question: WWJD?

On Contemporary Christian Music, I am glad Keith Getty, a CCM artist, lamented about the direction of CCM today. Temporary euphoria. I find that I must begin to look deeper into this as our church began to incorporate CCM more intently. What I need to look for and find lacking, is the critique on the musical composition of Christian music. Everywhere I look, the discussions are always about the lyrics, which is definitely most important, but the musical composition, melody, dynamic use, harmony, chords, etc. these I believe firmly also require sacred treatment, not just the lyrics. There is a meaning to why Holy Holy Holy repeats 3 times (Trinity) and the harmonization contrasts ascending tunes with descending (men's prayer to God vs. God's grace upon men), I can only find a hint of such talk if I attend, say, a workshop on Bach's St. Matthew Passion. This is my lament to God. Where were the geniuses God has gifted in Bach's time. After knowing David Chin, not personally, a Malaysian conductor promoting the works of Bach, I realized that it seems that in the East, we are doing careful theological analysis of church music while in the West, they lack such pursuit, especially in the church, their limit is only in the lyrics, not the music composition - why? Perhaps due to the disease of "don't judge", judging creativity is something Western post-modernism is getting very weak at now. But I should start looking into this, since the church I love maybe invaded by Contemporary Christian Music.

I couldn't find the video now, but Steve Lawson in I believe 2017, during GRII's Refo500, was interviewed in a van for what he thought about the Indonesian church. His response was Adrian Rogers' is the biggest. I think Adrian Rogers was the name mentioned, an American Baptist preacher. Of course, I thought to myself, you are comparing megachurches between a Christian country and a Muslim country, are you out of your mind?! Though I would really love to get my hands on all those recordings, Refo500. Must be great.

Recollecting this video, which during Professor Robert Kelly's BBC interview his little half Korean girl and toddler danced into his unlocked virtual interview office. Seeing now there are 51M+ views, the social media once debated about how Kelly raised his children, whether he abused them or not. I would just want to add here that there are 3 scenarios where someone in Kelly's shoe would react:

  1. As shown in the video - trying to respect his interview and apologizes while not displaying any extreme reaction towards his children, but trying to push them away which interpreted by some ultra-sensitive type as abuse.
  2. Scolds his children and be angry and look bad on public television.
  3. Just sits there, non-apologetic, letting his children roam about like they own the world, facing the camera with the attitude of "What are you going to do about it" - That's what the progressive, BLM, etc. movements today love. It's all about me, my benefit, my like, my etc.
Posted in Projects, Theologization | Leave a comment

Best place to Bid high quality violins

tarisio.com

The 2-set were at it again. To really own these, I think I would really need to know some basic making of violins, as well as their players (secondary).

Posted in Music, Technical | Leave a comment

Our Neighbor Joe's roofer info

RG Roofing

218 Church St. South Amboy, NJ 08879

Specializing in all types of roofing.
Replacement windows, doors & gutters.
Siding, decks, kitchens, baths & all interior renovations

Free Estimates

Richie
Ph. 732-721-3431
Cell. 908-217-6025

Heard he had heart attack so now his kaki doing all the work. Joe said try a few prices from various.

Posted in Technical | Leave a comment

2022 Holland Ridge Tulip Tour

Went in the morning 9am-1pm ticket, $13/person, Nadia and I. Huge properties, cars parking in the hundreds if not thousands. But other than color varieties, the beds are basically the same, just many of them. There was a smaller food court in the same spot as last year's sunflower (Sept-Oct I think) tour, tulip museum that briefly explained the origin of this farm. I can't believe Nana skipped the zoo, no big deal. Hay shuttle ride is free around the property, but we didn't try, we arrived around 10 am, hay ride line was around 10-20 people, but by the time we left around 11:30am, the line grew to 100+.

Nadia said she prefers our own little tulip gardens.

These do motivate me to want to look into the genetics of flowers, cross color breeding. Google "tulip experiment".

Posted in Botany, Projects | Leave a comment

MS Access 2007, 2016 run-time error 48, error in loading dll

A Windows 10 machine cannot open some function of a 2007 Access database. Giving the above error. This appears to have something to do with VBA > Tools > References pointing to Microsoft Word 12.0 Object Library vs. Microsoft Word 16.0 Object Library.

Solution:

Removed all MS Office in the Win10 machine. Installed MS Office 2016 (32-bit, since the original was 32bit), which changes all machines' access to the database to point to the new reference: Microsoft Word 16.0 Object Library, causing some errors since the 2007 version couldn't handle 2016 one (the fix is easy, just go in to the references and change it to the right MS Word object library version, but this has to be done every time manually whenever the other version from another machine use the database and thus changed the library version), so I installed MS Office 2007 again on top of the 2016 version. The system automatically defaults office apps, including reference library to 2007 version instead of the 2016 version. And this time, the 2007 on Win10 works great with all features of the database. I will not remove the 2016 version for now, too lazy to deal with it testing it without the 2016 version at this point.

Update 1/24/2023:

Maybe I could still get a better fix by figuring out what (could be DAO vs. ACE) was deprecated and add those features back, but then we would be stuck at Office 2007. It's time to move on. Since I've already updated some Access VBA scripts to be compatible with the higher versions (i.e. revise LCase to VBA.LCase instead, etc.), I believe that the old database is compatible with the 2016 client. The only thing I need to watch out for is not letting version 2016 to dominate and save the VBA references (as mentioned above), one way to do this is to keep the DB open on the server so others won't have exclusive rights to mess with it.

So the final solution is this: use Office 2016 for these All-in-One Dells. Use KMSpico if necessary. Works fine now...for now.

Update 3/10/2023:

Finally found the solution for this. I pastes the solution from the site here below:

Microsoft Access and Outlook Integration - 48 Error in Loading DLL

A customer with a 3rd party developed Access database/application ran into this issue with some new computers. These were running 64 bit Windows 7 and 32 bit Office. The specific task was trying to open a new email in Outlook from Access.

While the error was 48 Error in loading DLL the problem had nothing to do with DLLs. It ended up being that because the computer was preloaded with Office 2016 (trial version, from Dell), when uninstalled it left some garbage behind in the registry. After running Procmon and finding out what it was trying to do, it wasn't too hard to find and fix.

The solution in the end was to delete the registry key (and subkeys):

HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\TypeLib\{00062FFF-0000-0000-C000-000000000046}\9.6

Obviously make a backup of this key before deleting, but this did the trick for all affected computers.


The first registry key suggested above apparently weren't enough as the NYGC Student Access Database still gives the same error when clicking on the Class Registration Form button in Class Registration to open up MS Word template for auto-fill. So I ended up deleting a bunch of "office16" keys in HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\TypeLib\* by doing F3, until I got tired of searching, seems to be so many of them, and I decided to test it out and voila! It works!!!

Posted in Technical | Leave a comment

Thoughts

On Young Earth theology. They love to use the fact that by assumption, Death is bad, sinful, wrong, and therefore, Old Earth Creationists cannot explain the absence of death before the fall. But that begs the question, in what sense is death bad? Refer John 12:24 where Jesus talked about a seed must die for new multiple lives. Only the fundamentalist's idea of death is that narrow. Death is bad only in the context of human lives. To over generalize this the way Young Earth Creationists do, is foolishness and ignorant, regardless of the ending answer, for they did not use sufficient reason in their exposition, but mere traditions and fallen human instinct.

Posted in Theologization | Leave a comment

On Fowl Mouth, Cursing, Swearing - Martin Luther

Tong has said that Martin Luther, though fowl mouthed, used cuss words, has a pure heart; contrasting that with those who kept their mouth as clean as the outside of sepulcher, but their hearts are dark and corrupt, far worse than sewers.

The take away from this is to ponder upon what not to say, and how to handle anger. This is a yes and no answer, to whether to use curse words or not. Compare (Matthew 5:22 vs. Matthew 23:17 the word μωρός or moros => moron). And there is also consideration of the conscience in others, 1 Corinthians 8:7-10.

If I must go through endless argument with someone about this, then the solution is this: I create my own swear words against them, from languages unheard of to them. Now then, it is a matter of the heart, do I commit hatred against them as in murder in the heart, or even worse, this I must constantly reflect like Job did.

Source: TALKING TOUGH: MARTIN LUTHER’S POTTY MOUTH

On the last day of October in 1517, a scholar and priest named Martin Luther did as priests commonly did at the time when they had something to discuss amongst the clergy- he nailed a piece of paper to the door of the Castle Church in Wittenburg, Germany.  Unlike many other such documents nailed to the doors of churches, this one sparked a religious and social revolution, and established Luther as a hero (to some) and father of the Protestant Reformation.  Interestingly, some argue that to solidify his claim to leadership, Luther also felt he had to do something else – talk tough; and in 16th century Germany, that meant having a potty mouth. Regardless of his motivations, Luther could turn a filthy phrase with the best of them, as you’ll soon see.

In her work, German Hercules: The Impact of Scatology on the Image of Martin Luther, Danielle Mead Skjelver notes that, in Luther’s time, vulgarity and scatology (a strong focus on excretory functions and their products, or more simply, poop) were a part of (sometimes) even polite society. (In fact, later Mozart wrote some lesser known music such as Leck mir den Arsch fein recht schön sauber “Lick me in the ass right well and clean,” more here) Beyond talk, public defecation, while not well-received, remained common, and in fact, spreading feces on the doorknob of a foe was not unheard of in this era.

In that vein, Luther and his allies would use copies of his detractors’ pamphlets as their toilet paper – and then send them back to the authors. This was in keeping with the practice of the German nobility who sometimes dipped their enemies’ coats of arms in excrement and then carried that insult into battle.

So, during this time speaking about do-do was, according to Mead Skjelver, simply a form of tough-talk – equivalent to today’s locker-room bravado. Adherents to this theory point to other German men from the 16th-18th centuries also well-known for their scatology, including Johannes Gutenberg and Wolfgang Mozart. With this last, a thorough study was done that showed that in 371 of his letters, 39% had some sort of scatological reference, including to buttocks or defecation (45 letters), shit (21) and arse (19), among others.

So what did Luther actually say? As an example, in 1542, Luther is reported to have described his depression as such: “I am ripe shit, so is the world a great wide asshole; eventually we will part.”[1]

To say he was preoccupied would be putting it mildly. In 1531, in discussing an illustrative conversation he had with the Devil (which took place on a toilet), Luther said, “I am cleansing my bowels and worshipping God Almighty; You deserve what descends and God what ascends.”[2]

So great was his love for pooing that he claimed one of his most significant revelations came while he was on the pot. In attempting to understand Romans 1:17, the realization that salvation came through faith rather than through his effort struck him, and as he later claimed, “Here I felt that I was altogether born again, and had entered Paradise itself through open gates.”[3]

In his defense, the idea of the Devil loitering in toilets and it being his “playground,” was a common one.[4] So, it makes a weird sort of sense that Luther would, as he put it, “chase him [Satan] away with a fart,” or write to him, “Dear Devil . . . I have shat in my pants and breeches; hang them on your neck and wipe your mouth with them.”[5]

More than just bizarre diary entries, it has been argued that the Devil in these writings often served as a stand-in for many of Luther’s enemies, and that Luther’s followers were aware of this and applauded him for his bravery and strength.[6]

Not everyone was impressed with Luther’s vulgarity, however. The English Catholic, Thomas More (1478-1535) (Henry VIII had his head cut off on July 6), called Luther a “buffoon . . . [who will] carry nothing in his mouth other than cesspools, sewers, latrines, shit and dung . . . .”[7]

But Luther was undeterred and toward the end of his life, penned what was essentially an open letter to Pope Paul III in 1545 called Against the Papacy in Rome Founded by the Devil, in which Luther pulled out all the stops. Saving some of his best for last, Luther described the practice of indulgences as “an utter shitting,” and went on to claim that the “dearest little ass-pope” not only worshiped Satan, but “also lick[ed his] behind.”[8] (Licking someone’s butt at this time being somewhat equivalent to the modern expression “kiss-ass.”) He also said the Pope farted so loudly and powerfully, that “it is a wonder that it did not tear his hole and belly apart.”[9]

If you liked this article, you might also enjoy our new popular podcast, The BrainFood Show (iTunesSpotifyGoogle Play MusicFeed), as well as:

Bonus Facts:

  • Martin Luther King Jr. was originally named Michael.  His father was also Michael King, hence why Martin Luther King Jr. was originally named Michael King Jr.  However, after a trip to Germany in 1931, Michael King Sr. changed his own name in homage to theologian Martin Luther.  Michael King Jr. was two years old at the time and King Sr. made the decision to change his son’s name to Martin Luther as well.
  • Ever wondered what the symbols used instead of spelling out a swear word explicitly, such as “F*@k”, are named? In this context, the symbols are known as “grawlixes.”
Posted in Reflection, Theologization | Leave a comment

Institutes of the Christian Religion - John Calvin

I need to work on a project that illustrate this in video, background showing paints, arts, for illustration as detail as possible.

Posted in Theologization | Leave a comment

Voice of the Martyrs Corruption?

First, there was the suicide case of Tom White over alleged pedophile, which I journaled in 2012.

Now, after watching their Sabina Wurmbrand (founder of VOM with her husband, Richard Wurmbrand, both Jew converts), I looked up the names briefly and came across their son's (Michael Wurmbrand) letter against VOM, exposing their corruption.

I remember, I think, criticizing in my comment on one of VOM's video about Malaysia. I forgot what my comment was, but it has something to do with a false view of the situation in Malaysia, and I started to wonder about their president/CEO's actual work.

Michael Wurmbrand detailed financial corruption of this organization which kicked him out, the son of their founders. I don't know much about Michael Wurmbrand, but what he said and what I had observed in the past must mean something.

I still keep getting magazines from VOM, but will definitely not give any $ to them. CharityNavigator has no data on them which could also spell fishiness.

We do know they have millions, but what they do with it? If they are corrupt in finance, I cannot take the truth of what they claim in their newsletters/magazines openly.

I'll place Michael's letter in the comment.

Posted in News, Theologization | 1 Comment

Form Fields in MS Word have 255 character limit

So with my school database that generates a word document for Final Report for students, it hit a wall with narrative/comments from teachers that's over 255 characters long. Instead of complaining long winded commentaries, I just had to fix this.

The best solution page, that is thorough enough, I am pasting its content here, lest it's taken down: (I basically just used ActiveDocument.Bookmarks("Bookmark1").Range.Text Instead of .FormFields("Bookmark1").Result.

Lynn,

I think if you have a better understanding of what's happening in Word
you'll be better able to come up with an acceptable solution.

First, you are correct that the character limit for formfields is 255. In
addition, you can set the .Result property of a formfield without removing
the protection from the document using something like:

ActiveDocument.FormFields("Text1").Result = "This is a string of less than
255 characters."

This is the basic nature of forms protection: the only place you can add
content to the forms-protected sections of the document is the formfields
within the section.

However, as you have found, if the content to be added exceeds the 255
character limit, setting the .Result property of the formfield doesn't work.
In this instance, you have a few options available to you. You can:

* Use the Trim function to truncate the string at 255 characters. This is
probably not an acceptable solution since you undoubtedly want the whole
string to appear in your document.

* Use multiple formfields and the Mid function to parse the string into
255 character "chunks", which then get inserted into various formfields using
the .Result property as described above. Again, this is a less-than-optimum
solution because it's clunky and may not produce an especially attractive
result.

* Use a bookmark and something like the following to insert the text:

ActiveDocument.Bookmarks("Bookmark1").Range.Text = "A long string of more
than 255 characters."

However, as you have discovered, this method requires the section containing
the bookmark to be unprotected (for the reasons discussed above), and you
have stated that making this section unprotected is not an option.

The best solution is to unprotect the document prior to inserting the text
and then reprotecting it again afterwards. The code for doing this would look
something like:

ActiveDocument.Unprotect "password"
ActiveDocument.Bookmarks("Bookmark1").Range.Text = "A long string of more
than 255 characters."
ActiveDocument.Protect wdAllowOnlyFormFields, True, "password"

(See the Word VBA help topics on document protection for more information on
this code.)

Only one thing concerns me: You say that you are "pushing" data from Excel
into Word. This makes me think that you are driving this process from the
Excel side rather than from Word. I'm not quite sure if you will be
successful in trying to unprotect a Word document using code from within
Excel. This being the Word VBA forum, I suspect that most contributors would
take the approach of "pulling" data from Excel using code in Word - and thus
would not have to worry about this potential problem. However, some of us do
"cross over" so maybe someone else will be able to help you with this
possible sticking point. Otherwise, I can only suggest that you ask the
question in the Excel VBA forum.
--
Cheers!
Gordon

Posted in Technical | Leave a comment