Was reading a blog, acquainted with a Joshua Woo Sze Zeng (apparently studied at Trinity Theological College of Singapore), who has a blog in the past for nitpicking Dr. Stephen Tong's lectures and sermons (though much professional than others like 陳遠明 or 謙順, etc., mentally speaking, but nitpicking nonetheless).
Premise 1: If God exist, then he would eradicate evil.
Premise 2: Housework is evil.
Premise 3: I have to do housework, hence evil exist.
Conclusion: God does not exist.
But if God exist, clearly one of my premise is wrong. Which is it I wonder?
To which I answered:
That's easy:
Premise 1: If God exist, then he would eradicate evil.
Supposition: If and only if God eradicates evil, then evil would not exist.
Explanation: Since the non-existence of evil cannot exist without the eradication by (I reposted my comment because I used the word "of" instead of "by") God, therefore God exist.
Solved.
--------------------
Secondary:
Premise 2: Housework is evil.
Response: Says who?
Solved.
##############
I supposed he was trying to make a point that "housework is not evil".