On hearing David Kim's sermon yesterday, I awoke upon hearing his interpretation of 2nd Samuel 6:8 where after Uzzah was struck dead by God, David was "angry at God".
The scripture certainly has not that saying. But I had to be sure, so I found similar interpretation from John Gill & John Darby. However, Keil & Delitzsch did not view it such. The word for angry/displeased חרה was used. K&D says: The burning of David's anger was not directed against God...
I'd say it comes down to the fact that all the Bible versions I've looked up only refer to God as His action being the cause of David's anger. Not God Himself.
If I am allowed to extrapolate, I think it is sinful to jump to conclusion without a cause that David was angry at God. Kim tried to justified his biblical stand point by referring to the following verse to indicate that David has a change of heart even though he was angry at God because he then became afraid of God.
Sinful if such conclusion is to justify Uzzah's action. That it is natural to be angry at God if the violation is not of evil intent, but merely a failure to read the "fine prints" in the Law. Sinful if the conclusion is not the only option. That it is also possible that David was angry but a frustration of his own failure.
Hence, the aftermath can be discerned. I highly doubt, those who think it right or half-right to be angry at God upon such calamity upon the "innocent" will at all turn their anger at God into fear of God. It is impossible, for they have already received their own justification, there is no need for a change of heart. If they were to agree with David's change of heart, it would be as if saying "Alright God, since you are God, have it your way! My disagreement is useless!". Then they would have to claim God fails humanity, God fails rationality, just as the famous Chinese evangelist Yuan ZhiMing falsely argued: Religion is emotional, it has no place for rationality.