On recalling CCCNY, I hadn't written this down because I felt it was too minor to mention. But with a comparison between Michael Young and Michael Liu, yes, if it was anyone seriously of being a heretic and thus more damaging to the church, I would put Michael Young on the list. The one that claimed to be the founder of the church, who appeared to tolerate multiple heretic views, especially universalism, and practiced white lies like Rev. Lin. If anyone should go, I would say Young 10 times over than Liu. The fact that Rev. Lin chose Liu over someone like Young to kick out is an obvious example of how bad she's taking the direction of the church. Or, she was. I don't know what they do now. I don't really take Young's case a big deal, he's just a minor character, despite his claim of being the founder. Only can pray for her and them.
For some reason, the more I observe GRII's servants, the more I feel Rev. Lin's support is rather superficial, if not fake. Why? Only one I could think of: For some perverted humility of fame seeking. When when she found out about my online journal, her response was, verbatim, in her email to me in 2017: "...I've nothing to do with your personal life or what so ever [proof: irresponsible, revealing of fake care]...I appreciate that not to put my name and our church [proof: narcissistic and reputation hungry, despite fake humility in hiding it in practice, not truly seeking the truth] in your personal devotion for your own means [proof: fame seeking, self-profit business minded, non-sacrificial, as if everyone in the world is as selfish as her]...I seek no further conversation on these matters [proof: dictatorial, must have the last words, pride, power hungry]". This shows that even when a person's gone through proper theological training in seminary and have connections with the right people, she can still fail. If she does not repent, I am hoping the conversation we can have with whoever inherited her role if the church still exists, would be "Wow, we know Rev. Laura Lin was a failure, but how did God pull you through all these!!!"
I have asked this question, why I find in reformed/Presbyterian churches in America, many Fundamentalists? Because fundamentalists are usually Baptists. I think I have my answer: That though their conversion was heavily fundamentalism influenced, the ones that end up going to Presbyterian churches used to be Roman Catholics, and most likely gone through infant baptism. Thus, the unwillingness to participate in anabaptism nor accepting the strong argument of a Baptist fundamentalist.