Weekly Reflection

1/6/2023

The Americans today, the fundamentalist/conservative group, often view China only as CCP and therefore as a whole culture, China's fully influenced by anti-Christian sentiment since 5000 years ago, culminating to CCP in the 20th century if not earlier. So, in this sense, they tend to relate all the CCP wickedness to the entire Chinese culture. This obvious ignorance is common among the American people. Even their Christians. So this is one extreme.

There is however, another extreme (merging special and general revelations), which the fundamentalists who are influenced by the view that China = CCP couldn't grasp, even if they tried to appreciate God's work in China in the 5000 year history. This other extreme, is the promotional fiction that the ancient Chinese knew about the true God before the Americans knew how to say "Bible". Laozhi had it more maturely, even before the Greeks. That not only was there a flood, but they knew of Noah and the total number of residents in the Ark, all recorded in the Chinese character (船), which is obviously refuted by 说文 a much earlier text on word morphology. Also, without the Bible, the Chinese knew enough to connect lamb sacrificial atonement to righteousness = 義, viz. imputed righteousness, Laozhi (600B.C.) already knew about the Trinity in 道德經, and many more. Even I can come up with a few of this Allegorical interpretations: The Trinity is also know to the Chinese in the word 主,王. Easy right?

Nonetheless, Laozhi is truly great indeed. 人法地,地法天,天法道,道法自然
This 自然, has nothing to do with NATURE. 自然 here is closer to "I AM" - or "It is" in aseity, immutability.
有物混成,先天地生。寂兮寥兮,獨立而不改,周行而不殆,可以爲天下母。

Tips in Hawaii:
Lomi Lomi = massage (mana = 气 of bones) @ Malama Pono Massage
Hiking & Snorkeling (yellow tangs!) @ Captain Cook Monument Trail
Local Eat @ Kanaka Kava (local herb taste like alcohol)
Mahalo = gratitude

As I study through the works of Cornelius Van Til and the greats, I find it necessary to remind myself to not get caught up on the high terminologies they use lest I am bounded by such limitation from able to communicate the beauty of theology with commoners.

Watched the Bishop's Wife (1947) starring Cary Grant. Realized that it's copied by The Preacher's Wife starring Whitney Houston. Looked up some questions: Looks like this angel envy thing maybe related to the Nephilim interpretation in Genesis 6:2, that the "sons of God saw the daughters of men were fair..." to be interpreted as angels. I am open to that interpretation, but as Tong emphasized, it's better to ground ourselves in a more conservation translation of it, that sons of God = of the Godly Seth's line. And 1Peter 1:12 is just not about envy but angelic curiosity in the Gospel. Secondly, now since this is a "Bishop's" and there's talk of building the Cathedral of St. Timothy, I thought the whole time that it was a Catholic film, which actually turned out to be Episcopalian. I remember Lane Tipton speaking of how Rome corrupted the distinction between Creator and Creature with being as their tertium quid. So in this film, the angel (or more practically, saints, in real life) is the being and thus this angel must be a bridge between God and man, which is a no for any old princetonian.

Read also some fun facts (10 things you did not know-pasted in comment in case of future broken link) about the filming.

I'm reminded of long time ago, at least a decade ago, browsing through some extreme fundamentalist "Christian" groups, such as "A True Church" by Darwin Fish. They (or Darwin Fish, rather) basically call all the famous preachers false teachers. They believe that they ("true Christians") no longer sin, based on Hebrews 10:26. John Calvin dealt with this type in his commentary, they were called the Novatians, by Novatus. CARM ministry warned about this contemporary extremists as well. I just suddenly remembered them and thought to check them out. Looks like their Youtube uploads stopped about 9 years ago. Though the website's still up, I wonder what happened to them.

This entry was posted in Theologization. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Weekly Reflection

  1. timlyg says:

    From: https://mymerrychristmas.com/ten-things-you-did-not-know-about-the-bishops-wife/

    The Bishop’s Wife (1947) is a Christmas classic that demonstrates not only the enduring backdrop that Christmas can be to a story but it is also a peek back in time to an America that probably never will exist again.

    The film landed smack in the middle of a critical period of both film making and of the history of the world. It perhaps could be considered one of the last great black and white films of Hollywood’s golden era.

    The story revolves around three key characters: The Bishop, an Angel and the Bishop’s wife.

    824-2The Bishop is a driven, hard-working man on a quest to build a new church cathedral. His laser sharp focus and the trouble he faces in meeting his goal have caused him to neglect other parts of his life.

    Desperate to overcome, he prays and is rewarded with the help of an angel.

    The angel is not what anyone expects or can explain. He’s handsome, suave and prone to making every woman swoon – including the Bishop’s Wife, who is tortured over what has become of her marriage.

    How does this all become a Christmas movie? That’s the magic and it is the reason why it is a Christmas classic.

    Here are ten things you don’t know about the film:

    1. The film is based on a book published in 1928 by author Robert Nathan. The book gets far more carried away with the relationship between the Angel and The Bishop’s Wife. The movie never caries it beyond flirtatious banter and wishful thinking. After all, in 1947 there were still film censors to please.

    2. David Niven was never supposed to be the Bishop. He was cast at first to be Dudley, the angel. Roles were re-cast as Cary Grant came on board the project and he was not fond of the Bishop’s dialogue as written in the script. Being Cary Grant he saw the magic in the role of the angel and being Cary Grant he got his way. It was, in the end, an inspired choice.

    3. The movie was made just a year after It’s A Wonderful Life – to which it has been compared for decades since. After all, it features an angel (without wings) and a central character fighting a miserly opponent and a bummer of a situation. Like It’s a Wonderful Life the movie is not expressly about Christmas – but has been considered a classic of Christmas for decades.

    4. The movie was nominated for five Oscars and won one. It was not a big success at the box office. But like It’s A Wonderful Life it gained in popularity decades after it was made through constant Christmas-time replays on television. Working against The Bishop’s Wife at both the box office and in the Oscar race was another movie destined to become a Christmas classic: Miracle on 34th Street.

    the-bishops-wife5. Cary Grant was a persnickety perfectionist on the set – and this clashed with an equally difficult-to-get-along with Loretta Young. In fact, they really couldn’t stand each other. It is a wonder that their chemistry bubbled up to the final film product. In one scene set in the Bishop’s office Cary grant stopped the filming when he declared that “since it’s supposed to be winter shouldn’t the windows look like it?” The cast had to wait to resume filming until the prop guys could quickly frost the windows.

    6. Tragedy struck in the personal lives of both Niven and Grant just before film began. Cary Grant was famously close to the wealthy Howard Hughes, who at this time was hospitalized and not expected to live (he survived). But Niven’s task in filming came on the heels of even greater tragedy having lost his young wife unexpectedly due to an accident at a Hollywood party, leaving him a widower with two young children.

    7. The film has strong Christian messaging and is considered by some to be the Protestant answer to the Catholic leaning films of Going My Way and The Bells of St. Mary’s. In fact, The Bishop’s Wife quotes scripture as Dudley tells of the 23rd Psalm and the Bishop’s closing sermon is frequently used even today in many churches for its moving text:

    Tonight I want to tell you the story of an empty stocking.

    Once upon a midnight clear, there was a child’s cry, a blazing star hung over a stable, and wise men came with birthday gifts. We haven’t forgotten that night down the centuries. We celebrate it with stars on Christmas trees, with the sound of bells, and with gifts.

    But especially with gifts. You give me a book, I give you a tie. Aunt Martha has always wanted an orange squeezer and Uncle Henry can do with a new pipe. For we forget nobody, adult or child. All the stockings are filled, all that is, except one. And we have even forgotten to hang it up. The stocking for the child born in a manger. It’s his birthday we’re celebrating. Don’t let us ever forget that.

    Let us ask ourselves what He would wish for most. And then, let each put in his share, loving kindness, warm hearts, and a stretched out hand of tolerance. All the shining gifts that make peace on earth.

    8. The film features two child actors who also were credited in It’s a Wonderful Life. Karolyn Grimes, who plays young Debby in The Bishop’s Wife, was Zuzu in It’s a Wonderful Life. And Bobby Anderson, who played the young George Bailey who was slapped by the pharmacist in It’s a Wonderful Life, plays what is labeled in the script as “the captain of the snowball fight” in The Bishop’s Wife. Incidentally, David Niven, perhaps driven by his grief and dramatic change in his personal life, wanted nothing to do with children on the set of The Bishop’s Wife and asked to have them kept away from him. Cary Grant was welcoming to the kids and is known for pulling Grimes on a sled while he skated on the ice on the set of the movie.

    9. Cary Grant could ice skate just fine. All but the most difficult moves were filmed by Grant and it is easily seen when a stunt double has taken his place. He was able to don the skates after learning proficiency as a child.

    10. The film suffered at the box offices and endured several last minute re-writes. In some areas of the country the film was perceived as being “too religious” and was retitled “Cary and the Bishop’s Wife”. The more scandalous title increased box office receipts in some areas by as much as 25%.

    What makes The Bishop’s Wife work as a Christmas movie is not only the Christmas backdrop but as well the cast of extemporaneous characters whose job it is to interact with The Bishop, the Angel and The Bishop’s Wife.

    Plus there’s no shortage of good humor in the film. Niven was a bit put out by being re-cast as the Bishop but nobody could have pulled off the dismay he did in finding his trousers welded to a newly varnished chair (a trick that was somewhat cruelly imposed on him by Dudley).

    And nobody else could pull off a debonaire angel like Cary Grant.

    The Bishop’s Wife is a Christmas classic for a reason and should continue to enjoy immense popularity for generations to come.

    Share this:

    81Save

    PrintEmail
    Like this:

    Jeff Westover
    Father of 7, Grandfather of 7, husband of 1. Freelance writer, Major League baseball geek, aspiring Family Historian.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.