The City College CUNY Class: PHIL 32400 Philosophy of Language

Professor: Katherine Ritchie

Similar external resource

Key Concepts/Terms:

Argument: Premise and Conclusion

Valid: truth of premises guarantees the truth of the conclusion

Counterexample: A case with all T premises and a False conclusion.

Sound: Argument must be 1). valid, 2) all true premises.

Necessary (must have) & Sufficient (enough) Conditions

Syntax: Grammar (syntactic rule) What Chomsky was doing

Semantics: Meaning

Pragmatics: What language users can do with language

Use: The meaning of the word is what contributed to the sentence.

Mention: Word/Expression is being contributed to the sentence.

Type (kind) & Token (instance)

Intension(al): property associated with a word

Extension(al): The entities picked out/referred to

Intention(al): What one wants to get across, aims, goals

This entry was posted in Projects. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to The City College CUNY Class: PHIL 32400 Philosophy of Language

  1. timlyg says:

    02/04/2016

    SWA 1
    due on or before 3/3

    SWA 2
    due on or before 4/12

    SWA 3
    due on or before 5/5

    Reading: Grice-Meaning
    Understand
    Sarcasm
    Hidden motives

    Foundational Meaning Questions
    1. how do words/sentences have meaning?
    2. how do our utterances have meaning?
    3. do our thoughts/intentions(speakers) determine what our words mean?[Grice]
    4. Does our environment(audience...) determine what our words mean?[Putnam, Burge]

    The Plan
    The Aim: Foundational and descriptive meaning questions
    The view: Grice's account of meaning
    The problems

    Two kinds of theory
    1. Foundational meaning theory
    2. descriptive meaning theory

    Natural Meaning
    How could we account for how spots, clouds have meaning?
    features of natural meaning:
    1. entailment
    2. no entailment
    3. nobody meant
    4. No quotes
    5. Factive

    Nonnatural Meaning
    Features:
    1. No Entailment: x means p does not entails that p
    2. entailment
    3. somebody meant
    4. quotes
    5. not factive

    The Gricean View
    "x meant_NN that p" is true if, and only if,
    1. x was intended by its utterer to induce a belief in some "audience' that p and
    2. the utterer intended an "audience" to recognize her intention behind the utterance and
    3. the utterer intended an "audience" to believe that p by means of recognition of the intention
    Q: Do these require that the audience actually come to believe? Think back to what intentions are

    What are Intentions?
    Grice thinks intentions can also account for what we're doing when we make sounds and write marks on paper.

    A First Pass View
    Weak - X means P if A intends and to believe P

    A Second Pass View

  2. timlyg says:

    02/16/2016
    Reading on Dorit Bar-On's "Meaning" Reconstructed: Grice and the Naturalizing of Semantics

    Recall Gricean View:
    Speaker intention-> Speaker Meaning -> Public Meaning
    - A meant_NN that p by x
    - x meant that p
    - x means_NN (timeless) that p"

    Problems with Gricean View, Not:
    1. Psychologically realistic
    2. sufficiency: X means P if (sufficient) and only if (necessary) S...P, response: Higher-order intention (Intention->intention), but less psychological realistic.
    3. Necessity: X means P if (sufficient) and only if (necessary) 1). S intends audience believe P; 2). & do so given the recognition of (1).

    My notes: Grice appears to put the burden of understanding on the audience.

    Bar-On's Reconstrual
    think of Grice's view as a rational reconstruction of how nonnatural meaning arises in a natural world in which there is already natural meaning.
    'Genetic' Construal of the Gricean Program, evolutionary process by Gricean View.

  3. timlyg says:

    02/17/2016
    Steven Pinker (Language Instinct) beginning quote: words -> miracle we naturally forgot

    Putnam's reading: Meaning and Reference
    Externalism: Meanings just ain't in the head

    Two traditional Assumptions
    1. Psychological state (Putnam rejects, using twin earth thought experiment)
    2. determines its extension

    Dividing Linguistic Labor
    -Language is more like a steamship than a hammer
    -A hammer can be used by one person. A steamship requires the cooperative activities of a number of people.
    -Language too requires the cooperative actions of a number of people.

  4. timlyg says:

    03/03/2016
    Ruth Millikan:
    Why Convention is important
    - Get across more info
    - Community building
    - Organize
    - Signaling
    - Build common knowledge
    - Custom
    - in population

    My question on Millikan's objection to Lewis' convention requires Prescriptive Claim:
    Wouldn't Lewis be open to language change/crossing of convention?

  5. timlyg says:

    03/07/2016
    Grice: Logic and Conversation
    Descriptive
    Prescriptive

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.