In a recent FB debate, I am pushed to do this in depth research. In general, Calvin's view/analysis is the best. It's not transubstantiation of the Roman Catholics, nor consubstantiation (which is actually just transubstantiation but just saying that the flesh and blood are also bread and wine at the same time - as if they're very smart at that "supra-logical" statement) as Martin Luther puts it, nor is it just symbolic as Zwingli had it, which many evangelical and charismatics subscribe to.
Ligonier touched on Calvin's view, which Calvin largely discussed on in his Institutes, book 4, chapter 18: Of the Popish Mass. How it not only profanes, but annihilates. There are many more resources.
This is where I shall do in-depth study on.