This one is so good I would have to do a comment on it.
When French brought up a horse-shoe diagram about the ultimately same camp where extreme left and extreme right land together, it is so similar to my circle chart, which I presented later to David Tong on a Facebook comment. I did a full circle instead of half or horseshoe because the bottom curve needs to show that being neutral or not left or right leaning can ALSO be a bad thing, in fact, it's the highest IQ or the lowest. Someone who avoid getting involve, seek to bury the truth (usually in the name of some perverted peace or love) is actually worst than the extreme left or extreme right, because he is claiming that he has no position while his inevitable position is actually opposing everyone from left to right such that only his position is the winner, he just doesn't admit what he's doing, which makes him worst.
But this is about the debate between Allie and David, so I shall explore with the summary of this video:
Good point by Kaitlyn Schiess against Allie's Toxic Empathy being focusing only on the emotion of empathy, while missing toxic anger and disgust being emotions as well that is frequently used to justify righteous empathy or, as Phil Vischer puts it, "masculine" empathy, as good empathy, "feminine" empathy as toxic empathy.
Update 6/3/2026:
Skye Jethani and Bri Stensrud could be stereotyping a little bit, but they do have a point against Allie Beth's book: Toxic Empathy, in such that one camp would pick and choose what they considered empathy if it aligns with their own self-believed righteous agenda; And where they don't align with their political ideals, it's toxic empathy: