A long time ago, I've observed one common thing interracial marriage today shares (particularly Asian & Caucasian, regardless of which gender side): That at least one of them has to be a liberal. I've rarely encounter, in fact, I cannot call a single one from my memory, where both of them would be conservative, or not liberal. Had I married one of such, I believe I would be the liberal one, at least for a while and would perhaps be smart enough to look for a liberal one as well.
The conservatives/non-liberals may not consider interracial marriage as an option, unless the opposite side is very confident and consistent in his pursuit. In general, not universal. It is the mindset genetic encoded within the Western culture particularly in America. If they are opposites, then the marriage may not last. For the non-liberal one may begin to see the destructive problem of the liberal and may not tolerate further.
Now if they are both non-liberals somewhat, then there may be a chance for a lasting marriage. But they would have to both come from a rather open family background or there maybe struggles with the in-laws, not just in the common in-laws problem, but in political manner as well. Political not as in politics of the country, but politics of human nature, of family, of life.
I believe there those who are both very conservatives. Such is rare and of my curious interest to study, should I meet one.
The common liberal directions of xenophiles are: the more different the better - belief in evolution, hence my Caucasian counterpart is of a one branch of species beyond human family tree, while myself another offshoot of a different ape, humanoid ancestry from a different branch of species originated somewhere else on the planet. Heck, let's imagine intergalactic relationship if it is possible - inter-alien relationship from outer space - Star Trek went there already. Superiority, unique, etc. White folks love Asians for specific reasons. Marry a Japanese wife, they behave better as a wife, they cook, they do all the chores, etc. while a German or American wife would ride on you instead. I've heard of such sayings more than once, from a white Russian student in Arkansas to an Palauan In-Law (indirectly) of a German church lady.
If that is their pursuit, then they would be very disappointed by the truth. Their creativity against it would destroy themselves. I know of a Malaysian (half-Taiwanese perhaps) woman, very conservative, divorced her white husband, who's probably very liberal. Two beautiful girls. Now today, I saw one of my Arkansas friend, a Japanese posted on Facebook his divorce with his white wife he married from Arkansas. I am quite certain he's the liberal one. A son and a daughter. The son grew and committed suicide in his teens. He called himself not him but "they", influenced by today's very problematic gender confusion of the liberals. I do not know the reason behind the divorce. Is his wife too conservative to handle his liberal take on life? He once tried to challenge me that there was another religion that also claim monotheistic other than the Abrahamic faith when I tried to preach to him saying there's no such idea. It appeared that he became "Christian" when he got married. I don't know. Below is an excerpt of his post. I simplified the names for privacy:
D and I are now divorced. It's been a tough year, and it is not something that I wanted nor expected, but the decree has been issued as of this morning. D and I are committed to becoming good co-parents for M, and we will both remain in B at least until M graduates high school. D was renamed back to DW. I was very fortunate to have met D and got to be her husband for all those 20+ years. I am thankful that we got to have our beautiful kids together and the wonderful memories that I get to keep for the rest of our lives.
I private messaged him because I care and I shall pray for him and hopefully get to chat with him again. On importance of the Gospel and hopefully, reconciling his marriage.
Now that is not to say that there are no good interracial marriages. The truth that a lot of these "childish" interracial ideas is that they think they are progressive enough, but actually not. I wonder how they would wonder in denial knowing the fact that Genghis Khan had already popularized the idea of Eurasian 600 years ago. Moreover, there is no such thing as different races (Caucasian, Mongoloid, Negroid) branching of from different non-human species from the evolutionary tree. There's no such tree to begin with. Noah was the progenitor of us all. All races come from him. I also believe that there's little evolutionary trait between different races. The colors in different races come not from weather, but simply natural selection. The darker skinned would go with darker skinned, and the fairer with the fairer from Noah's time. It's a prejudice of fallen men, regardless of good or bad intention. The different colors of the races only proves that Noah and his predecessors were incredibly more diverse than we could ever imagine. There's no evolution of genes in different races, they are all inherited from Adam to Noah. That includes colors. Those that say otherwise believe they are more scientific, but when you look closer to their "scientific" notes, they are mere speculative at best.
Now knowing the truth, if they could still be a good married couple, I would marvel at God's creation in the sense that I get to see the original design of mankind, a slight glimpse into the days of Noah, my great ancestor. If not, at least their children will do just fine for my gratitude of such glimpse. Of course, there are those lasting interracial marriage that are nonchalant to all these, but they are only into themselves, they build a wall around themselves, like any selfish, those in self-denial, oblivious and indifferent to their surrounding. The view where there's only you and I, everyone else are jerks, everyone else is hell. I have no interest in those folks as well.