"If you do all the talking when you pray, how will you ever hear God's answers?" AW Tozer #tozer
Calendar
Categories
Recent Comments
Meta
"If you do all the talking when you pray, how will you ever hear God's answers?" AW Tozer #tozer
These days the promotion of homosexuality, gay marriage, trans, bi, what have you, triumph.
There is one reason: The idolization of family. When the culture over promotes heterosexual love, family values to a point of idolization, the balancing force kicks in. Thus, the opposing values are inevitable, and the two extremes dances in a symphony of godlessness.
These soon will pass.
This is a prominent theological problem among the Chinese Christians. One championed by Yuan Zhiming.
Just believe it with your heart, don't analyze, don't reason.
But here lies the problem, when people ask questions, sincerely hope to understand, reason with the truth, they are basically asking: "Should I abandon my ignorance and foolish desire?"
So, to say, don't analyze, don't ask, just believe, is to say "Don't abandon your ignorance and foolishness, just believe". Therefore, it is not really solving anything but adding new contradictions, hypocrisy arises as well.
In the worst case scenario: I will keep my foolish desires, but I am a believer, I have the faith, so DON'T YOU DARE!
Course Syllabus
第一講 導論&太史公自序(一)(主題:什麼是責任?)
第二講 太史公自序(二)(主題:以俟後世聖人君子)
第三講 報任少卿書(主題:誰為為之?孰令聽之?)
第四講 報任少卿書(主題:太史公牛馬走司馬遷)
第五講 五帝本紀(主題:好學深思,心知其意)
第六講 吳太伯世家(主題:道德與成敗)
第七講 伯夷列傳(主題:儻所謂天道,是邪非邪?)
"A Pharisee is hard on others and easy on himself, but a spiritual man is easy on others and hard on himself." AW Tozer
The reason people dare to ask challenging but sincere question, is because they have concluded that the lecturer is a man bold enough to stand for the truth. Therefore, when people do not dare or want to ask any challenging questions, it is not possible that they want to show support, but more likely that they in their hearts expect/accuse their lecturer to not be able to answer truthfully.
“A Japanese company and a North American company decided to have a canoe race on the St. Lawrence River. Both teams practiced long and hard to reach their peak performance before the race.
On the big day, the Japanese won by a mile. The North Americans, very discouraged and depressed, decided to investigate the reason for the crushing defeat.
A management team made up of senior management was formed to investigate and recommend appropriate action. Their conclusion was the Japanese had 8 people rowing and 1 person steering, while the North American team had 8 people steering and 1 person rowing. So, North American management hired a consulting company and paid them a large amount of money for a second opinion.
They advised that too many people were steering the boat, while not enough people were rowing.
To prevent another loss to the Japanese, the rowing team’s management structure was totally reorganized to 4 steering supervisors, 3 area steering superintendents and 1 assistant superintendent steering manager. They also implemented a new performance system that would give the 1 person rowing the boat greater incentive to work harder.
It was called the”Rowing Team Quality First Program“, with meetings, dinners and free pens for the rower. There was discussion of getting new paddles, canoes and other equipment, extra vacation days for practices, and bonuses.
The next year the Japanese won by two miles. Humiliated, the North American management laid off the rower for poor performance, halted development of a new canoe, sold the paddles, and canceled all capital investments in new equipment. The money saved was distributed to the Senior Executives as bonuses and the next year’s racing team was outsourced to India.”
What is interesting is that so many Americans love this joke I wonder if it was written by an American or not. Nevertheless, one question remains, who are the Americans this joke is referring to? It surely cannot be the Americans who love it. Who then? The corporate chiefs and CEOs in USA? The U.S. government? The American patriots? The conservatives?
From the above observation, I can conclude thus, that many American citizens do not really consider themselves Americans...or at least responsible for the country they reside. These perhaps have the encouragement to think so because they believe their heritage is not American but foreign when they or their parents immigrated here. Despite their eventual settlement and obtaining citizenship here in this country, they do not see themselves as Americans, especially when America is viewed in a negative angle.
There will be a great tragedy from this because while they don't hold themselves responsible for their "alleged" country, their children who are most certainly born and raised in this country definitely have an opposite opinion about this. I suspect there are very few of us who realize this and therefore has a sort of advantage for the future. But the moment must be seized quickly.
Then, it was about education. People go to colleges not for knowledge (even though that is what they have learned to say), but for careers. "古人培养精英,今人培养工匠".
Now, from what I could observe from social media: People work not to build a family (again, they still know what to say), but for a great vacation. Until they have spent it all in hotels, they come back to work for the next round of "fun".
Ron Choong had a thesis on this, I think. I have commonly understood the challenge of this paradox: Is it good because God commands it; or does God command it because it is good?
The solution is to refer to the attribute of God, the nature of God. Hence there is no need for a third option as William Lane Craig suggested (I am still perplexed with his "God and abstract objects" topic). The answer can go with either one provided that God is the source of good.
Isn't He cruel?
Answer: It is no difference than how gravity can kill. Nobody seems to complain how cruel gravity is. And since God created and set the rules of physics, this only shows us that God is sovereign and that the cruelty is only invented by ourselves. God is obviously actively showing His righteousness against those who do evil (we were all sinners).