Coursera Extended Learning: Genetics

XY is not the only sex-determination system.

There are others, such as ZW, temperature, etc.

Posted in Biology | Leave a comment

YAAI error: $80040209

Yet Another Avi Info is a very good tool to fix out of sync Audio/Video files.

But sometimes, the xvid codec/decoder causes problem.

when i try to sync audio with YAAI i get the following massege:
" The operation cannot be performed because the pins are not connected. ($80040209)"

It is understood that the problem lies not with the codec, but the decoder.

There have been suggestions on other decoders, such as Koepi's. I tried, but to no avail.

The decoder I eventually used was the longer known: ffdsshow.

Posted in Technical | 2 Comments

23andMe

Interesting information from my Evolution coursera course from Duke University.

With the advancement of DNA testing, now this 23andMe company can provide information of a person by usually a mere spit for around $99. Ancestry ethnicity percentage, health, risks of child's health, etc.

I cannot verify the how authentic is this testing...but it is remarkable if it is true.

Posted in News, Questions | Leave a comment

Rock Paper Scissors is a $50,000+ prize Competition

I can't believe I looked up this game on Wikipedia, after my Standford professor in Game Theory mentioned it.

And perhaps a side strategy on Tic Tac Toe...So I can put my recursive programming skill on a more complex game such as chess:

Posted in News | Leave a comment

Horsemeat in Beef Burgers?

If this is happening in U.K., what do we have in U.S.A.?

She adds there is an "enormous amount" of horse meat in the food chain. "Where do people think they go when they become useless?"

I don't mind eating horse meat. But I would like to know when I'm being served one, so I may perhaps adjust my balance of diet accordingly. Now the capitalism is failing, after  communism.

Posted in News, Questions | Leave a comment

Understanding the connection between Targum, Talmud, Mishnah and Gemara

"The Talmud has two components: the Mishnah (Hebrew: משנה, c. 200 CE), the first written compendium of Judaism's Oral Law, and the Gemara (c. 500 CE), an elucidation of the Mishnah and related Tannaitic writings that often ventures onto other subjects and expounds broadly on the Hebrew Bible." -Wikipedia

So, long story short:

Talmud (means instruction) is the second important text after the Torah. It is the rabbinical writings. It has two parts: First, Mishnah, the earliest collection of those writings, laws based on Torah but not of the Torah. Second, Gemara, explanation of Mishnah and other stuff. The production of Talmud was chiefly in Babylon (where some Jews remained after the Babylonian captivity), after the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans.

Targum (means Explanation) is basically commentaries of Torah.

Update 5/14/2026:

After joining the Christian Underground to Muslims, I've learned much to add here, using Google AI:

The Oral Torah (Torah Sheb'al Peh) is the body of laws, interpretations, and traditions in Rabbinic Judaism believed to have been transmitted orally from God to Moses on Mount Sinai, alongside the Written Torah. It explains the practical application of biblical commandments and was codified into the Mishnah and Gemara (together forming the Talmud) around 200–500 CE. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Core Components and Purpose

  • Definition: It consists of 613 commandments given to Moses, including interpretations and legal details not explicitly detailed in the Five Books of Moses.
  • Purpose: To explain the cryptic, often ambiguous, or incomplete instructions within the Written Torah, such as specifying what constitutes "work" on the Sabbath.
  • Transmission: Traditionally passed down through an unbroken chain of teachers to students to maintain personal, living connection and engagement with the material.
  • Codification: Due to the risk of being forgotten during the hardships of exile, it was recorded in the Mishnah (c. 200 CE) and later the Gemara. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Main Texts of the Oral Torah

  • Mishnah: The initial, concise collection of oral laws compiled by Rabbi Judah the Prince.
  • Gemara: A comprehensive collection of Rabbinic analysis, commentary, and debates on the Mishnah.
  • Talmud: The combination of the Mishnah and Gemara. There are two versions: the Babylonian Talmud (more widely studied) and the Jerusalem Talmud.
  • Midrash: Interpretive explorations of the text, often offering legal or ethical lessons. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Key Principles

  • Halacha (Law): The binding legal rulings deduced from study and tradition.
  • Aggadah (Narrative): Philosophical, ethical, and narrative discussions.
  • 13 Principles: The Talmudic hermeneutical rules used to interpret the Written Torah. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

The Oral Torah is essential for the practice of Rabbinic Judaism, enabling the law to be applied to new circumstances throughout history.

Do all Jews believe that Oral Torah as orally transmitted from God to Moses in Judaism?

No, not all Jews believe that the Oral Torah was orally transmitted from God to Moses at Mount Sinai. This specific belief is a fundamental tenet of Orthodox Judaism, but Jewish denominations vary significantly in how they view the origin, divinity, and authority of the oral tradition. [1, 2]

Perspectives by Denomination

Denomination [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]View on Sinaitic OriginView on Authority
OrthodoxDivinely revealed to Moses at Sinai; passed down verbatim or via interpretive rules in an unbroken chain.Fully Binding. Considered equal to a direct divine command.
ConservativeCulturally and historically developed by human rabbis; inspired by God but not dictated literally at Sinai.Binding. The Talmud remains the essential framework for Jewish law (Halakha), but modern rabbis have more flexibility to adapt it.
Reform & ReconstructionistEntirely a human product created by ancient sages to understand their times. Not revealed at Sinai.Non-Binding. Viewed as a valuable historical, ethical, and cultural resource rather than a legal obligation.
Karaite JudaismExplicitly rejects the existence of a divine Oral Torah. They view the Talmud as a collection of human traditions.Rejected. They rely strictly on the literal text of the Written Torah (Tanakh).

Historical Differences

  • Ancient Sects: During the Second Temple period, the Sadducees rejected the oral traditions completely. They adhered strictly to the Written Torah, whereas the Pharisees championed the Oral Law (and became the ancestors of modern Rabbinic Judaism).
  • Beta Israel (Ethiopian Jews): Because they were isolated from mainstream global Jewry for centuries, they historically practiced a form of Judaism based entirely on written texts (the Octateuch) and did not possess the Talmud or Oral Torah traditions until modern integration into Israel. [1, 2, 3, 5]

Would you like to explore how Karaite Jewish practices differ without the Oral Torah, or see examples of how the Talmud interprets vague written biblical laws? [1, 2, 3, 4]

Posted in Theologization, Vocabularies | Leave a comment

Sermon Review: God's Approbation of His Works by John Wesley

John Milton's Paradise Lost is praised as comparable to the goodness of God's creation.

So, John Wesley concluded the 4 elements: earth, water, air and fire as the building blocks of the cosmos.

An interesting Note, or question:
And even in paradise “Adam slept,” (Gen. 2:21, ) before he sinned: Sleep, therefore, belonged to innocent human nature. Yet I do not apprehend it can be inferred from hence, that there is either darkness or sleep in heaven.

Good ending:
by his apostasy from God, he threw not only himself, but likewise the whole creation, which was intimately connected with him, into disorder, misery, death;

Conclusion: Wesley would not have believed in evolution.

 

Posted in Questions, Reviews | Leave a comment

How to Make Fake Shark Fin

For Shark fin soup. Not long ago, I tried it with a frozen shark fin imitation. Using the recipe below from Youtube. It was good. The black fungus helped imitate the shark fin texture while the fake shark fin, a harder form of vermicelli noodles, is just okay.

I cannot think of a way to make the imitation of shark fin more authentic. The ones in the market just aren't crispy enough.

Posted in Culinary, Questions | Leave a comment

How to Deal with Children's Ministry on America Today

Paul Washer said it on several occasion that he would not send his children to 98% of Sunday schools in America.

Even in the churches I've been to here, the ministry has been ignored, pampered, ill-treated and sugar-coated by wickedness of all kinds starting from hypocrisy ending with superficial psychology. I feel so very sorry for the children for the way these dogs have been treating them. The goats, both young and old, remain in the church. The resulting youths are as liberal and nonchalant as their piers.

Something must be done at the level of their piers. It cannot be just a matter of hiring someone to take over the whole case. A penalty must be paid.

However the solution turns out, it must be geared towards the direction of making the parents become truly Christian parents. Able to teach and bear witness for Christ.

That means, the leaders themselves must be parents, or of parental quality. Not just some active youth with a little know it all, while the rest of the adults are on a kind of "opium" vacation, or feeling satisfied for finding a cheap and moral idea for baby sitting their children while they went off peacefully to work and maybe give thanks to Guan Gong or Guan Yin once a while. Yes, many Chinese-American churches are really that bad. The older they are, the prouder they are having to do less things.

Thus, this is almost building the whole ministry from scratch, which affects all the way to the pulpit of the entire Sunday Service. The pastors must confront the parents in Biblical lifestyle. There is no excuse. Either one is called by God, here lies the proof of refute.

Then, if no one can take up the case of leading the youth, which is pathetic, it is better to start with the adults. A fellowship just for the adults, gearing towards building a holy family. The youth are welcome to join. Either this fellowship nor none at all. There is no shortcut. If their parents cannot fellowship together (not having lunch or watching baseball), how then should their children be expected to do so?

I shouldn't dwell too much on this now, as it is too ridiculous. First they failed the test by kicking out one who's committed to be evangelical towards the youth, against my advice. Now they want me to be the chief of their children ministry? It is easy to refute, gracefully and justly.

I simply said 2 conditions: Allow me to invite Paul Washer, and then perhaps Michael Liu. If they are not welcomed, I am certainly not welcomed as well. Paul Washer may be more admissible for them because he is an official pastor, but I doubt they would admit either one, for that is laughable otherwise, unless they see the need to change not in the structure and programs, but in themselves. I need not waste my pearls and sacred things here.

Posted in Theologization | 1 Comment

Preview on the book A Puritan Theology, an interview by Janet Mefferd

Janet interviewed Joel Beeke, and here's my summary:

William Perkins, considered to be the Father of Puritans.

Problems within puritans:
Richard Baxter, though a puritan, but he was not sound on justification by faith alone.John Eaton was an antinomian.

Recommended books:
Communion with God by John OwenThe Existence and Attributes of God: A Discourse upon the Goodness of God by Stephen Charnock

On sins:
The Doctrine of Repentance by Thomas Watson
Sin, the Plague of Plagues: The Sinfulness of Sin by Ralph Venning
The Evil of Evils (AKA The Exceeding Sinfulness of Sin) by Jeremy Burroughs (powerful on and high sensitivity to evil)

On Christology:
One Hundred and forty-five Expository Sermons upon the whole 17th chapter of the Gospel according to John: or, Christ’s Prayer before his Passion explained, and both practically and polemically improved. Folio. pp. 672. Abraham Miller for Thomas Underhill: London, 1656. by Anthony Burgess (on Christ's intercession for us)
The Heart Of Christ In Heaven Towards Sinners On Earth by Thomas Goodwin

On the Book of Job:
An Exposition on the Book of Job by Joseph Caryl

Other puritans to look at:
John Winthrop, John Cotton, Thomas Shepard

Pilgrims = Separatists
John Winthrop was one of the pilgrim gang who never separated from The Church of England.

The age of Puritans basically ended with the death of a John Howe in 1703 (1705?) where Jonathan Edwards (1703-1758) became the transition figure between the puritans and Unitarianism.

Standing Out according to Beeke:
Thomas Goodwin's theology is superior to Owen's, Goodwin's works are easy to understand, simple enough for starters.
Anthoy Burgess is Beeke's current favorite.
John Bunyan
Thomas Brooks? (If I have not misheard)

What's missing today:
Experiential theology: Doctrine of grace experienced in the soul.
Of Domestical (Domesticall) Duties by William Gouge

 

Posted in News, Reviews | Leave a comment