Sermon - Stephen Tong Sunday Service 6/28/2020 Matthew 5:33-37

God used Covid-19 to increase children's Bible camp's number from a couple hundreds to thousands, streaming the camp live online.

Chinese high officers don't trust Chinese's own banks, sent their money overseas as US dollars to be saved. Why? They trust US Dollars and not their own Chinese stuffs.

Why we use God's name? To hope others will believe us.

孔子说 民无信不立, unfortunately, many governments do not take this seriously. Japanese Prime Minister Tanaka (田中 角榮) wrote this phrase of Confucius, a nation without the trust of her own people will lead to her own. Unless the people trust me, I cannot be their prime minister. Later, due to scandal, proved his mother's negative comment of him when she was interviewed regarding her son's career.

The lying shepherd parable was mentioned. Everyone should build relationship with truth in all aspects.

On Swearing oath for high federal officials in all countries: An important confirmation, ritual. Placing Bible/Quran in hand. Jesus said, don't swear, but here is exceptional because the government does not believe in the individual and since the government is set by God, it is permitted do to so (for office, in front of the government).

So the command against swearing is for personal relationship. Credit Card = 信用卡. The Western influenced banks record and measure a person's trustworthiness via credit card. The Chinese however use the countenance as the measure of trust. The Chinese has a saying: Primary life of one is his body, spirit & character. Second is your face, your history such that when people see your face, they trust you.

Tong recalled borrowing money from a relative for buying a car but the relative claimed that he didn't pay back even though he paid back the very next day. So he paid him again. Since then, Tong promised himself to have nothing to do with this relative in matters of finance. A painful lesson.

Another recollection of Tong: When he helped deliver money (that he didn't inspect) between Malang and Surabaya, he was accused by one party for loosing portion of the money. Since then, he had them write down the numbers and checked. (My take: Interesting that Tong would still do this for them...must be a big heart, or perhaps he's doing this for someone else and avoided the ones before completely in this matter).

So why do we need to swear, inevitably? 2 reasons:
1. If you don't pay attention before problem, problem will come. So, in such situation, swear before trouble comes may be inevitable.
2. When confronted with problem, swearing to God to proof one's own clean record.

Can we not swear? Only one reason: If you truly honest, everyone believes you. An honest/righteous person, God treats him with honesty/righteousness. Psalm 18:24-26. 乖僻的人,你以弯曲待他. 上帝不用乖僻待他。

God always rugi against the devil, because he never lies.The Devil is the father of lies.He'll deal with the liars in the day of judgment.

Does swearing solve matter in this society? No. It's only used to cover one's own lies.

Tong recalled a scammer using Tong's pastor friends name to cheat Tong's money. This guy is famous scamming this way with many. Tong once checked with the pastor and he never knew that guy. Tong even came across that scammer one time in the elevator and publicly exposed him. One day this guy even tried to cheat Tong's brother who's in HK. The brother got Tong to attend the meeting with the scammer since he recognized the name from Tong. Tong's brother called the cops after confirming this from Tong and the scammer was arrested.

So the lesson, there's no use in swearing. The best is honesty.

Of all U.S. presidents who swore by the Bible, only Nixon used 2 Bibles for his oath. But he was ruined by his scandal. Later Chairman Mao invited Nixon with red carpet, Chinese remembered Nixon's work in building the U.S. -China relationship. Chinese takes old friendship seriously. At the time, Nixon was not welcomed anywhere else. Nevertheless, Mao shamed himself for calling Nixon's scandal small matter being overrated.

Zeno (Anthologus, 3.36.19)

“Zeno said to a man who wanted to chatter more than listen “Young man, Nature gave us one tongue but two ears so that we may listen twice as much as we speak.”

Ζήνων πρὸς τὸν πλείω λαλεῖν θέλοντα ἢ ἀκούειν ‘νεανίσκε’ εἶπεν ‘ἡ φύσις ἡμῖν γλῶτταν μὲν μίαν, δύο δὲ ὦτα παρέσχεν, ἵνα διπλασίονα ὧν λέγομεν ἀκούωμεν’.

The Bible: Listen swiftly, slow to speak. Tong modified Zeno's quote with reformed theology:
God created us (Nature gave us...)....created two ears two eyes (two ears two eyes), so that we can listen and hear good and bad, right and wrong, but when we witness, we can only witness for the truth, right is right, wrong is wrong. If we do uprightly, God favors.

Posted in Questions, Theologization | Leave a comment

Back to Office

After the NY Governor approved of this Covid-19 measure, SPG is starting a phase 1 (some minor % of employees returning to work with social distancing). I started returning Tuesday (7/7/20) (Tue, Wed, Thurs). Supposedly doing this for the next 30 days.

The same week, 7/6, SEVP also made the decision to deport all international students who are taking only online classes. Making it all colleges and ESL schools crazy. Harvard & MIT are ready to sue Trump. More than the 100,000 required e-signatures are submitted to the White House's online petition.

I think though Trump's still a much better candidate than most, however, whenever he tries to touch foreign policies, I fear he leads America closer to demise, despite to the support of his right most supporters.

Posted in General | Leave a comment

My Covid-19 Observations

One important question I've been pondering has been surfaced in this pandemic lockdown:

What's the difference between a Sunday Service (or any church activities) that can be done without any difference from a televised broadcasting?
Preachers don't really engage with the audience/congregants. etc. So some would ask what's the point of coming to church physically.

Some misidentified mistakenly that this is about worship. But it's actually about fellowship. Worship can happen anywhere, anytime. But a Weekly gathering is a sub-category of worship, a relationship building among saints.

Posted in Biology, Questions, Reflection, Theologization | Leave a comment

Vocabulary: Punctilious

Kathy’s Word of the Week

Weekly Brain Food brought to you by our CHRO

punctilious

Pronunciation:
puhngk-til-ee-uhs

Definition:
Marked by or concerned about precise accordance with the details of codes or conventions.

As used in a sentence:
Since her aunt is quite punctilious about table settings, every utensil must be turned properly.

Posted in Vocabularies | Leave a comment

On Friendship

Perhaps beware of people who give very good impression on making friends. Benefits of the doubt must be honored.

However, perhaps ask them, if there were anyone they knew that they tried to stay away from...and if yes, perhaps ask why? Then perhaps stay away from them. Don't waste time making friends with these lots. Perhaps make friends, but not really at the level of fellowship. Useful friends. Friends who only get to sit on the bench and watch you at work for the glory of God, but they do not participate, they do not share a fellowship with you, until they can learn to receive people they hate/despise. The more enthusiastic they are at first, the more cautious one must be against these. Because their chief goal is their own satisfaction, they're just trying to show that that is not the case, they may likely be very good at the practice, so beware.

Posted in Reflection | Leave a comment

Christians will suffer: John 16:33

New International Version
"I have told you these things, so that in me you may have peace. In this world you will have trouble. But take heart! I have overcome the world."

Tim Keller had said this in 2018: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ulmaUtbayGY

However, according to Stephen Tong, in his KL 2020 sermon, Keller seemed to have implied that Christians don't necessarily face pain. Perhaps a slip of mind. Of course, Keller never really emphasizes pain as something we should thrive above with God's grace. More like "just hang on and trust God" part of the truth.

Posted in Theologization | Leave a comment

New Children's Hymn by Stephen Tong: Kucinta Firman Tuhan

David Tong posted the numeric music notation on Facebook. New song made in Jakarta, 22 June 2020:

David Tong:
My father's heart for children
Throughout his life, he has a heart for children ministry. Thus, at the age of 80 he still wants to preach to them (and he connects well with them). He started working on composing this song at 5 AM on June 22nd, hours before he preached to thousands of children online. May God bless his tender heart.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_puvbFBdCE

Using MuseScore, I made this (I guess playing lots of hymns helps me with writing chords):

Posted in Hymns and Scriptures, Music, Theologization | Leave a comment

Sermon - Stephen Tong 6/21/2020 GRII Service: Matthew 5:29-32

Claims 11,000 viewers on average on Chinese & Indonesian services combined weekly. Exceeded the Roman Catholic churches in Indonesia.

The expository on this passage is far superior than that of John MacArthur, etc. Those who fell for the trap of legalism: You have an affair, I can now divorce you legally, with clean hands. Very few of these preachers touch on the forgiveness of the spouse who had an affair. Though Tong definitely did not critic on divorce harshly here, perhaps due to Ahok's case, when touching the seriousness of marriage, he referred to Hebrews 13:4. Broke that verse down into 3 parts. Emphasized on the first word "Marriage" so strongly that he even corrected the interpreter's translation which did not put the word "marriage" in the beginning of his sentence to make it stand out by phrasing it in passive form.

v. 32: Once everyone learns of the exception clause "saving for the cause of fornication", they love it as an excuse to divorce their spouses, so that they can be "free" again, to go out with whomever they wish. But in the previous verse, Jesus once again used the phrase "It hath been said"...meaning this is human's interpretation of God's word. Thus, it is flawed or in this case, insufficient. For Jesus gave an incredibly deep lesson in this verse. That those with ulterior motives are clearly proven to be sinful as they only cared about themselves, they do not care about the well being of their spouses. They do not care about their neighbor. They defended themselves with the law. It is not perfect in God's eyes. There's no forgiveness, it is not Christian.

In this verse, there's a cause and effect. Cause is, wife committed adultery, but the effect is you make her commit adultery even more. You didn't solve the problem, but you've created new problem. Thus, outside Christ's salvation, sin cannot be solved. Here also confirms that Jesus affirmed that divorce although is not something can be avoided by all.

However, this is not God's heart. Otherwise, there will not be salvation upon the Adam and Eve and their descendants.

Tong: I cannot say you shouldn't follow the law justify your divorce, but is this the best option?

You can do it, justify yourself by the law, as Tong recollects a pastor's message...but if this problem can be resolved by simply divorcing her when she commits adultery, then that means that there are sins such as these, that cannot never be forgiven. This is not the principle of the Bible. There should be forgiveness, hope for repentance, return to the original love, union.

We should find the best principle from the Bible to obey God and follow His heart. Instead of turning the law of God into a human cultural regulation that's no after God's heart.

Ancient China has 7 great reasons for divorce (七出三不去):
1. No child
2. Always quarreling
3. Talkative wife
Tong gave only 3.
4-7:不顺父母 (probably same as #2),淫,妒,有恶疾,窃盗
那三不去也挺有趣的:三不去包括:一、“有所娶无所归”:指妻子无娘家可归;二、“与更三年丧”:指妻子曾替家翁姑服丧三年的;三、“糟糠之妻不可弃”:指丈夫娶妻时贫贱,但后来富贵的。

Multiple wives was practice as a side way against the rules against divorce in China's tradition. As an excuse not to "offend" the first wife or to keep the reputation of not divorcing. Such is for self-satisfaction, reputation and not act act according to the truth.

Tong: Such is the difference between Chinese culture and Western culture:
Western: Don't like spouse, get rid and get new one. So always just one wife.
Chinese/Eastern?: Many families with multiple wives.

Examples of marital struggles in the Bible:
Tong: The most foolish thing a woman can do in this world is to introduce another woman into her husband's room. God created a woman with a narrower heart than a man for a purpose: The create a perfect family without the intrusion of sin. Unfortunately, Sarah equated God's will to her own will.
When Hagar became Abraham's child bearer, could Abraham divorce Sarah? One night became thousands of years of wars.

2nd example: Joseph, who had no opportunity to marry one from his own people. He had to marry an Egyptian. But he never sinned in this.

3rd example: Moses, who was accused of marrying an (possibly) Ethiopian, a black woman. Not of Israel. But he did no wrong and Tong believes that he committed no sin against marriage though the Bible did not clarify.

4th example: Samson. Is he a womanizer? No. But he loved Delilah too much, the product of the gentiles, which does not accord God's will. Samson's love for a gentile woman, is of the Lord...so hush. (I've only found this verse in Judges 14:4, where it's the woman in Timnah, not Delilah the harlot, in fact the Timnath woman was Samson's only wife of his life, perhaps Tong got this mixed up, because I don't see what else I would have missed) Note that not all our marriages are of God's will.
God's 4 wills:
1. Eternal Plan = You abide, you're blessed.
2. God's guidance in history = While you're confused. God shows his love by guiding you to His eternal will.
3. God's permission = When you do not obey, when you rebel, God allowed you to proceed. Lots of marriages are like that. Not of God's plan, not of God's guidance in history, but temporal allowance of God. Man often thought he's in God's guidance, but actually just to please himself. Samson is likely such example. He loves Delilah, but not God's will. He's attracted to her. God allowed. This kind of allowance is 2nd of the two cases in the Bible. First was when God allowed Israel to split with Judah. Usually don't end well.


Don't critic people's divorces too much. Nothing else we should be doing other than grieve and pray that God will blessed they separate lives that may still continue to love God. If they remarry, we hope that they will have a better marriages and lives. There's only one man that's after God's own heart, so though David committed adultery and killed Uriah, in other words, none of us is more favored by God than David in the entirety of our lives. God nevertheless blessed David's descendants => Jesus. Must God bless through such heinous sin to the conception of Christ?
Tong: I won't touch on this, but instead I will speak that even after horrible sins, God can still bless you, your descendants. Of course, Jesus Christ was not completely descended from David, for He was conceived by the Holy Spirit and born of the virgin Mary. Thus, Christ did not inherit the curse of Adam and Eve.

Now let's look at Paul. Was he celibate? Pharisees must be married (I'd researched and questioned this before, in previous entries, that the members of Sanhedrin though are better married but not required. A married man is preferred because he's more merciful.) So Paul must be married. But he had no wife in his ministry. So where's his wife?
1. Died and he vowed not to marry again.
2. Wife splits with him after his conversion as she remains in Judaism. Tong believes that Paul may have been divorced. Paul once said, if wife does not follow husband's conversion, let her be, even separate. So if that's the case with Paul, we can only use this teaching to understand Paul's situation.

Posted in Theologization | Leave a comment

Lincoln Square Redeemer Church Q & R 2020-06-21

Thus far, Joe Yu has given great responses on multiple occasions. I was impressed starting last week's.

This week: Great responses especially by Joe Yu on ethnic churches & wearing masks...

https://www.youtube.com/embed/DRG_mJXhW00

Posted in Theologization | Leave a comment

Sermon - Stephen Tong 6/14/2020 GRII Service: Matthew 5:27-32

Psalm 122:1 I was glad when they said unto me, Let us go into the house of the LORD. 

A good verse for a Covid19 situation, where everywhere is in lock-down.

I have the recordings in both Mandarin and Bahasa.

Incestral relationships were against God, though permitted for animals. Particularly Spain, lots of such relationships in the royal families, for they cannot marry a commoners. Thus, King Edward VIII who fell for an American divorcee had to abdicate his throne (voluntarily) in 1936 - Per Tong.

God placed most sensitive organs in sex, physically and emotionally.

Tong: Adultery = Any heterosexual relationship outside of the proper one.

Two types of Adultery:
1. Pre-marital Sex. God's law forgives (if you were not married and be responsible for your sin) such and they must be married. Tong: There's a "Deon" Society in France, announced (1860) huge reward to those married couples who were proven virgins before marriage. No one claims it for 100 years. In the 1500s, the Magellan voyages brought many European sailors home after contracted Venereal Disease, VD from prostitutes around the world, and infect their wives. Europe, the only Christian place in the world at the time, was in trouble. 500 years later (1928), penicillin was shown to cure VD. This discovery happened between World War I & World War II, (1928). 500 year punishment from God.

The physical freedom of human kind is superior to all animals. We can hug, etc.

"Thou shalt not commit adultery" from God vs. from men. They are different. If one's sexual lifestyle does not break the rule of family, this is God's will, otherwise, it's considered adultery.

Homosexuality: Our skin is double layered, except for the anus. So, when gays have sex, it will cause injury. This unholy behavior brought AIDS, God's punishment in Romans 1.

After the discovery of penicillin that cures the 500 year VD, instead of repentance, more daring sexual sinful acts were committed and thus, in the 70s, God allowed AIDS which has no cure until today.

Look proper. David's example was brought up.
Tong: Women, bath with door shut tightly, preferably do not sing. David's one look, had 4 children died.
Job 31:1 我与眼睛立约,怎能恋恋瞻望处女呢?Tong: Meaning before marriage, my eyes are permitted, because I need to choose a wife, but after marriage, NO.
Therefore, beware what you watch, one false look falls into the devil's hands.

v. 28 Tong: Lust = when you look on a woman married to someone else. For if both are unmarried, for the purpose of marriage, it is ok to "lust".

More on to be continued in next week's sermon.

Posted in Theologization | 1 Comment